Since I've switched to classes my code is more reusable and I've developed a framework of sorts. I'd like to comment up the files properly so wanted your opinions on what to include. Based on PEAR I have this:
* File/Class Name
* File/Class Description
* Author My Name | www.mywebsite.co.uk
* Version 1.0
* Last Updated 7 September 2013
* @vendor VendorName
* @package PackageName
* Released under the MIT license
* Copyright (c) 2013 My Name | www.mywebsite.co.uk
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
* in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
* to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
* copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
* AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
* THE SOFTWARE.
Do you think it's overkill to put the license in each file? I notice some do this but JQuery, for example, just has a link to the license on their site and Symfony tells them to read the file.
Have I missed anything out?
I don't use Git yet though plan to lean. One additional thing I'd like to know is: if you're not using version control how to do you keep track of what was added, removed and fixed in each version? Do you just keep a text file logging everything?
IMHO each file should at least state which license it is under and have a link to an online copy.
I suppose the text isn't all that much, but I think what I would do is include it if the file might be used stand-alone otherwise put it in a separate text file if it's part of a package.
I never really paid notice to how often any license changed, and I don't know if software written under one version is "stuck" or if newer versions supercede the original older version.
I have put changelogs in the head comments before, but that can get lengthy in time so now I keep them in separate changelog files.