force — 2013-07-01T13:53:26-04:00 — #1
davemaxwell — 2013-07-01T14:18:53-04:00 — #2
I would LOVE to know the reasoning behind the decision, short of laziness.....
felgall — 2013-07-01T15:44:52-04:00 — #3
smanaher — 2013-07-02T08:07:31-04:00 — #4
This is an interesting development. When it comes to features like this, I think users should be given the choice rather than be forced into using it one way or another. That being said, its their browser and it is free so its not like people can complain too much, especially when there are other options out there.
I think a more interesting topic is how they made third party cookies disabled by default,
stevie_d — 2013-07-02T08:28:21-04:00 — #5
Note to self - must disable automatic updates on Firefox when I get home (not that I use it much anyway, but it's good to make the point).
ralphm — 2013-07-02T08:45:02-04:00 — #6
It's a crazy decision. Hopefully the dev tools will still make it possible to disable JS.
ronpat — 2013-07-02T12:48:26-04:00 — #7
Thanks for mentioning the "Note to self". I have now done so.