I think initially, it was to save time and speed up the rendering, but if the browsers are smarter, they can for example, render it fast first, and then when everything is displayed, then render images better when they are resized on the display. (kind of like displaying the text first, and then load and add all the images to the display later so that the user at least has something to read).
Now this tickles something in my head, but I can’t put my finger on it. There were either programmes, or Javascript, something, which would incrementally load an image not from top to bottom but first a nasty pixellated version, and then more detail gets added until there’s a full, detailed image. Some people wanted this to happen and I remember seeing it somewhere, but I can’t remember where. But as to how the image looks once it’s entirely loaded, I don’t think you can change that, and I still can’t see where a browser wouldn’t display 100% of the information once it had it.
About 9px font legible on one platform and illegible on another system, could it be the default font difference.
Why I said “same dpi” as this seems to make the biggest difference between machines who can otherwise display the same fonts, smoothing, etc. So I didn’t mean the one font would look physically smaller, but that one would seem “clearer” to the eye and thus legible. Sort of like the image example you posted, where the texts in the image are the same size and font, just one is more legible.
As for looking at Eric’s image in Safari… I have seen the difference in how whole pages look the moment I first got Safari for windows (I don’t have a Mac). Again I think it’s more the way Safari’s rendering engine simply works, or some extra algorithm in there, which FF, IE, and Opera just don’t have. Since it looks better on the Mac regardless, then I would even say that there’s an additional Macintosh algorithm that the newer browsers can pick up too. So again, Windows and Linux machines would have to have this to get their browsers to render images as nicely.
Me, I’m too cheap and surely not hip enough to buy a Mac : )