funny_alien — 2012-11-25T05:03:47-05:00 — #1
Hello Dudes and Gals!
I wonder: is inmotionhosting really as good as the reviews of it?
gate2vn — 2012-11-26T01:31:53-05:00 — #2
As usual, I don't trust unlimited offers. They can limit you many other things such as very small CPU, RAM, number of inodes, etc. Why do you want to use their services? Any particular reason?
promptspace — 2012-11-26T03:12:20-05:00 — #3
I have recently heard a lot of bad reviews about it in other forums. Wouldn't recommend it.
vincewicks — 2012-11-27T09:16:52-05:00 — #4
This hosting provider is new, so there can be some issues with stability. In this case I would not recommend it. Try godaddy or something else )
technobear — 2012-11-27T13:08:45-05:00 — #5
New? They've apparently been around since 2001.
I've never used GoDaddy, but if you look around the forums, you'll find they have a good reputation as a registrar but not as a hosting company.
hostingplace — 2012-12-09T19:45:50-05:00 — #6
Heard some negative things about go daddy hosting in the past, never heard of inmotionhosting, i always prefer to use web hosting that has limits so at least you know the server is not being oversold.
system — 2012-12-19T08:18:05-05:00 — #7
i noted that so many web hosting company put only good review in their forum and put face testimonials in their websites . therefore you have to be very clever before subscribing to any hosting providers check their domain expiry date , pr, who is data, companies physical location, and mostly check their review in the different websites/forums/directories instead looking review in their own domain or the post they made in the other websites.
past 10 years i was using 1 company and i used their service for 3 years there was no problem till that time. but after that they shutdown their live server due to violation of data center tos.
so i don't wish any website owners to loose their valuable web information.
technobear — 2012-12-19T08:28:51-05:00 — #8
As the OP hasn't returned, and nobody seems able to answer the question anyway, thread closed.