I prefer it to the old one. But that’s maybe more that I was not a fan on the old one.
Strange, when I first saw it, I had a thought that they may drop the multi colour design too, and they were just keeping it for now to ease the transition. Pure speculation on my part, based on no evidence whatsoever and quite probably completely wrong. The colours are part of the branding, even if they do look awful on the G icon, which would certainly look better in plain blue.
I think they should switch back to the green ‘G’ on the front.
party like it’s 1998, huh?
Google logo change
Q: Do they still do search?
A: Yes they do!
OK, I’m done here…
It is the new Goo-glogo?
No, it’s the new Googoo-gaga.
I would have preferred something more creative like that.
However some designers say that Google is much more than a search
engine now which is true. But I really dont see that in the wordmark…I
guess that is why it is wordmark haha
Yes, good point. Although you could also argue that Google has returned to being a search engine, with other undertakings coming under the new banner they have—Alphabet (or whatever it is).
what other new undertakings?
I hope they, one day, invent a new Soup!!
Self-driving cars and al that.
Want to lay an alpha bet on that?
I don’t understand what you guys are talking about…
Alphabet?
abc.xyz?
Thanks, I missed the news.
It’s rather funny that GMail is still showing the old logo (at the bottom of emails—“Powered by Google”). I guess it’s a big job to update the whole system, but still, you’d think they’d jump right in and change things like that on major products like GMail.
This topic was automatically closed 91 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.