You know, Iâm pretty used to people who know NOTHING about HTML/CSS getting their panties in a wad when I post the truth⊠But ânot garnering factsâ â EXCUSE ME?
You want facts? FINE. Your site uses color combinations illegible to a large swath of the population⊠on top of a disastrously broken layout. Honestly, Iâd applaud the attempt at using dynamic fonts on the page, if the layout was designed to scale with them; but what you have is the typical âwhat do you mean %/em or even PT automatically enlarges for large font usersââŠ
Here is EXACTLY what I saw, without using any extra zoom features on my system apart from the OS setting.
http://www.cutcodedown.com/for_others/zygoma/broken.jpg
This is caused by my using the accessibility â120 dpiâ windows setting, and your using %/em fonts in a layout designed for a fixed HEIGHT. That âauto enlargementâ is the entire REASON for using %/em fonts â but the layout you put them into isnât designed to handle it.
You want FACTS, read the WCAG about color contrasts! Are you HONESTLY telling me you find that large red text in your content column LEGIBLE? The black text beneath it SAME? Eyesore at best, illegible at worst. Red on black only has a 33% contrast difference, red on a sum of that gray ends up LESS than that.
Honestly, Iâm SHOCKED youâre listed in google at all - since the keyword stuffing gibberish below the picture break in that same area should be getting you slapped down for⊠well, keyword stuffing⊠though at least itâs not content cloaked, likely WHY youâve not set off the radar.
From an accessibility standpoint your heading orders are GIBBERISH. Is âWeather resistantâ a subsection of âwedding photography testimonialâ? Is âWedding photography pricesâ a subsection of âweather resistantâ?!? Of course not, so why are you saying they are with lower-order headings? (H3,H4,H5)
the page comes in at 1.3 MEGABYTES â meaning most likely a lot of people donât even bother waiting for it to finish loading; on a page that to be frank even WITH the fancy pics likely doesnât need to exceed 256k âas isâ.
Those ARE facts⊠that I âgarneredâ â and if youâre going to put your head in the sand like an ostrich about it â lah-lah-lah like the Vancome Lady⊠Oh well. Stay in 1997.