How about the people who label themselves as Content Curators? FYI, for those who are unfamiliar with Content Curators, they are probably one of the newest form of label in content writing. Content Curators are very much alike with a researcher. They take existing elements, give this existing element proper credit, add their own element, and basically create a masterpiece out of this. Basically if what I understand is correct, writing a thought though in a different way, adding it with a content curator's own twist and own tone, does not classify his/her article as an original content. After all, it is still pertaining to a topic already existing.
Am I right or did I miss something?
I know this is very far from the topic of Content Spinning, but in the same way that topics are being spun and twisted, I suppose this is more or less connected?
This is from the side that topics can be twisted although writer still gives credit to people who should be properly recognized as authors.