Would you agree this is the definition of a PHP framework?

[TomB]

@tony_marston404

Incorrect. I simple said that DI is evil when used in inappropriate circumstances. I showed that in my framework I actually DO use DI when the appropriate circumstances exist, but where those circumstances do not exist I do not use DI. I never said that where I do not use DI the code that I use is better than DI.

Please respond to this:

@TomB

So you’re seriously suggesting we should take a line on a wikipedia page which has [citation needed] as more authoritative than a peer reviewed paper from CERN or Manchester University.

Are you going to defend your claim that a statement on wikipedia (With [citation needed], I might add) is more authoritative than peer reviewed academic papers or will you concede that academic papers are more likely to be correct?

For reference you said:

@tony_marston404

Just because you find articles which offer a different definition than the one found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_framework does not means that those articles are correct. As far as I am concerned they are merely offering different opinions, and I do not agree with those opinions.